Question: In my situation , I filed into the case the CR™ (sent to Mortgage Lender and attorney) to Land Court to give them a courtesy copy because it is ONLY a Order of Notice. The attorney has to file this because of persons entitled to the benefit of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Mortgage Lender is claiming to have interest in a Mortgage covering the property now held by plaintiff by assignment and filed a complaint for determination of Defendants Service members status. That's why I didn't do the Verification of Complaint. Would this be the right way since it's only a Order of Notice and not an Order?
Answer: I would treat every mailing from the court as an offer and act accordingly.
If the plaintiff did not have a claim when you did the CR™, then why would the same have the need to determine "service status" unless that one is seeking to administrate the estate? So, where is the claim underwriting the NEED to put that request into the court? It is ALL the same bullshit.
Guest Comment: That's why I ask questions because I'm not sure. You're right , it's all the same BS . I will get the next CR ™ letter ready to send off after the 30 days are up. The attorney got the letter Monday and the Wilmington Savings is still in transit as of today.
Would it be wise to send the Verification of Complaint or let the CR process play out? In the mean time I will study more of the process.
Answer: CR™ "process" first. Verification of Complaint is for when and if the matter hits court.
Re: CR™ Principles
Question: In reading the Verification Of Complaint (VOC) it states the Executive Order 9698 caused ALL public offices stand abandoned; their functions having been since transferred to the United Nations, while I did not read this in the Executive Order that E.O. was revoked by E.O. 10083. Not that anybody receiving the VOC will scrutinize it; one never knows. While I have not read every word of the UN Charter to locate where all public office functions have been transferred to the UN, it appears that the UN Charter is the "TREATY" that all members agree to.
Answer: Primary function is peace although each member retains their sovereignty. Further, the Charter prohibits force, so force, to me, means arrest, taking of property by gun or sheriff unless the "contract" ones signs becomes the "law" and thus provides the right to use "force", albeit against the Treaty that ones government entered into. The crux of ALL contracts being what does the contract state as far as what need to be "paid", such as United States Dollars or United States currency or $ followed by numbers, ie. $350. Does this override Emergency Banking Act or go against it, thus void at inception. This is probably the most important element of everything, ie, some claimants achilles heal. Violates Emergency Act, violates Treaty law (doing things by force), violates though shall not steal (by any means). I could be incorrect but is this as simple as it gets? Not that "lower" courts will agree but seems to me somebody is the enforcer (besides "God" of the ether) although the following demonstrates the DIFFICULTY of enforcement remedy by a private person http://law.lclark.edu/live/files/9582-lcb111stephan.pdf Might come down to the squeaky wheel proposition. [end]
Notice: In all your matters you constantly whine about here on the forums, did you put in an ACTUAL claim, or just try to stop something from happening?
Since you profess to not have faith; the persecution get to the best of them, maybe you should just go do the Minnesota DBA and claim your kingdom in the land of Canaan and become a Canaanite? Seems to be working for all of those people who do as such; They love their bowls of porridge. [end]
Notice: Remember: these are ONLY suggestions, modify these to your own situational needs.
Below are EXAMPLES for an entire Commercial Redemption ( CR)™ "process" (3 steps)
1. Initial CR™
2. Conditional/Follow-up CR™
3. Final CR™
What the CR™ "process" teaches one is HOW to walk with the Christ consciousness.
Essentially, one is VOIDING the ORIGINAL contract/debt collection in INFANCY and THEN accepting any remaining debt thru an ACT of GOOD FAITH with CLEAN HANDS which is NOW the contract in play and establishes the TRUST: ALL Contracts operate thru Trust.
The Conditional acceptance OPERATES this Trusted Contract and establishes the penalties AGAINST the Trustee (BAR Attorney under Military Authority: see FM 27-5 and FM 27-10) and the CORPORATION vessel utilized by such (ref: 15 USC §§ 1 and 2).
The act of the collection attempt against the original purported debt obligation, SEALS the Trust because the action of the collection would be a trespass resulting in an exercise to claim profit from property that does not belong to one; pernancy of the usufruct.
Go back and read Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS) regarding Estates and the Bovier's 1856 article from the archives.
You see, in 1953, the Department of Justice established a 100 mile border zone for Customs and Border Control surrounding the nation where the Constitution no longer applies, thus ONLY Martial Law exists in this zone (ie: Lieber Code, FM 27-10 and 27-5, Hague, Geneva, etc...), so you all had BETTER learn how it operates and this is where the civilian due process roots and foundations occur. Read archive article regarding civilians for introduction information, get copies of FM 27-5 and 27-10 for further information.
This is also where the "Is there a Breach of Peace?" approach comes into play.
For example: within FM 27-10 there is passage that basically reads that the occupying army is 100% responsible for all medial cost associated for anyone Interned. Well, since the occupying army has SUSPENDED the constitution, the people are thusly Interned within a Military Zone under Martial Law, thus the Occupying Army gets the bills resulting from HEALTH CARE (i.e.: restoration of public order and safety). The BC is the evidence of such, thus there is NO need for Obama-care for anyone with a Birth Certificate to have "medical insurance" ...i.e. Obama care is basically a huge subsidy and incentive package underwriting the profits of the medical and pharmaceutical industries (Read: inflated stock values for the insiders) by those who enrolled within it: just another insurance scam.
You can thank RB@Mountain Mission for verifying this for we had known about the BC regarding a couple of people who went in for triple-bypass surgeries and they were treated like Kings; thus the second witness.
So, it would be nice if you all would donate to Mountain Mission, 704 C 13th Street East, Whitefish Montana 59937-9998 ... You have heard RB on some audio. He is responsible for helping me comprehend the military side of these matters. He is good people and deserves as such.
Now, if you all are STILL interested in the Postal information regarding the address change, please DONATE thru PayPal.com to (email) ...he is also good people and deserves as such. Just beware the pitfalls as I have described above.
I do request and recommend that you donate to these people BEFORE you contact them and ask any questions. It is only RIGHT that you do for they gave all to help you all, so it is only fair that all give some.
KEEP THIS IN MIND: Liability is a relative term for one does serve one master, not two.
Therefore, one does have a liability to one's master; which master is the question.
And while it is correct that the State is the "owner" ...the source of the property interest the State "owns" is the image of God Almighty so created for whatever God Almighty created IS the SOURCE of all Title and Value, thus God Almighty is ALWAYS the ultimate subrogator; [1. to put into the place of another; substitute for another. 2. Civil Law. to substitute (one person) for another with reference to a claim or right] ...one will ALWAYS have a liability unto God Almighty to observe, fulfill and obey His covenants and laws.
God Almighty ENSURED His images received LIFE and INSURED His images also receive EVERLASTING-LIFE free from Sin in service to His Kingdom; Thus God Almighty is the ONLY one with CLAIM over His images; The State (LORD) has CLAIM over ITS images; HOWEVER, the operation of His image and ITS image is EXACTLY the same in heaven as on earth.
Therefore, one ALWAYS has a liability to observe and obey the Laws and Covenants of God Almighty, lest one receive a visit from the LORD of Hosts (ACCUSOR) for the failure; LORD God bestows the blessing of His covenants to the righteous; the LORD of Hosts and LORD God TOGETHER make up the State of which is the Romans 13 ordained authority and people turned their backs on LORD God, thus LORD of Hosts is what the people received for that is all there was left and the LORD of Hosts did its DUTY unto God Almighty by showing His images a world without knowledge or love of God Almighty for LORD of Hosts really has NO duty unto any image of God other than lead those images BACK to LORD God and visit the Wrath of God Almighty unto the same for violations against the covenants and laws of our Father.
There really is no way to NOT "get it right," but people seem to fail to comprehend, those accounts and stuff people seek to "pay bills" and "settle accounts" are for God's Servants; for use to build and expand His Kingdom here on Earth, thus one must FIRST seek the Kingdom of Heaven from within and receive the blessings of our Heavenly Father; the GRANT of the Heavenly Estate, BEFORE one can ever HOPE to claim one's Earthly estate for the Earthly estate was created to RECEIVE one's Heavenly estate.
Every time one runs into an obstacle; each time there is a door shut, a wall erected; that is the ACCUSOR making accusation that one is NOT worthy of God's Kingdom nor receive His blessings. Therefore, one need to REMOVE the impediment by conversing with our Father within His Throne Room/Courts of Heaven for this is where the scrolls of the Accusor reside and understand WHY the ACCUSOR has the authority to DENY one's inheritance as co-heir with Christ and then CLEAR the accusation for once one accepts Christ in one's heart, his SPIRIT flows thru one: His blood now one's Blood; one's Blood now His Blood, and His blood washes away ALL sins.
Remember this when the ACCUSOR shows up.
This has very little to do with the paperwork and everything to do with one's faith and connection with thine Father who art in Heaven for Boris does not make ANY decision if one is to receive one's Heavenly estate and thus free one's Earthly estate from bondage; that decision belongs to our Father who art in Heaven for ONLY He knows one's appointed time.
Question: apologies and more information on the CR™ "process"
Answer: The way I see it, using the $2.00 over-payment as surety removes them from bankruptcy, thus cutting the purse strings which hurts these guys more than anything else.
AND it would be best to use the Verification Of Complaint for entering the CR™ in to the matter for that rebuts ALL the presumptions AND establishes your CLAIM to the republican form of government and now they can't hit you with that "pro se" tag
QUESTION: ok...what if one is not doing it on a court case yet. Would you still use the Verification of Complaint or wait till a court case comes up on that issue?
Answer: I would wait for the court case because after you send in the third notice, no further payments will be made. Now, the debt collector will "declare an emergency" and seek Court ..your introduction of the CR™ thru the Verification kicks in the attorney's FIRST duty to protect the court and the public AND the CR™ shows there is no further threat to the public because the 2 dollar over-payment PULLED the "debt collector" out of bankruptcy thus ceasing the emergency.
I did not come to destroy the law, but fulfill it. And to fulfill Martial Law is to achieve peace because that is the purpose of "martial law" and "war" FM 27-10 Section 2(c): the purpose of the Law of War ... to facilitate the restoration of peace.
That is why I just use a simple CR™ because I am not out to "get them" but to go to peace as an ambassador for and co-heir with Christ and since bankruptcy is a "State of emergency," then to remove the impediment to peace one would remove the facilitator of the emergency ...the bankruptcy.
Now, the attorney or "debt collector" has no more debt to collect for once peace is established, all debts incurred during war time cease to exist.
That is the purpose and intent behind that 3rd and final CR™ letter; that is where the peace is established and if any do an act against peace, that is an international crime and the CR™ defines the punishments in the 2nd CR™ letter for the 1st CR™ letter absolves the debt being collected via the AFV/RFV novation.
Question: apologies and more information on the CR™ "process" What I am comprehending or concluding the request or conditional acceptance for "proof of claim" is not asking for evidence/facts/proof that a contract exists or some incident took place but "proof of claim" meaning where is the breach of peace? The acceptance being, we are not questioning the debt (non belligerent) and we merely are the pass through without interference so they can do what they do. The acceptance is the evidence of peace.
Is this correct?
I kept thinking when one does acceptance with proof of claim the respondent can come back with perhaps all kinds of proof or evidence of a contract/statute/whatever so what good is any amount other then it is a novation. Then I got silent and stopped thinking and what showed up ...If I've accepted, for value or with a postal money order, where is the peace being interrupted? I would be merely a part of the circuit that assists to discharge by grounding (man on the land) the charge back to peace. It's all about peace John Lennon knew something
Answer: The acceptance/return DISCHARGES one's duty.
The presentment of the Money Order along with accepting any outstanding debt, creates the PEACE accord.
If these guys go against the PEACE accord, it would be an Act against the Peace, and under their own MARTIAL LAW, that is an INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIME and a crime against Humanity and now the MILITARY: Division of Civil Affairs takes over.
Did anyone actually read FM 27-5 and 27-10 regarding the Courts and Crimes?
Here is another source.
And look what we have here: ...Military government was "that form of government which is established and maintained by a belligerent by force of arms over occupied territory of the enemy and the inhabitants thereof." In this definition the term "territory of the enemy" includes not only the territory of an enemy nation but also domestic territory recovered by military operation from rebels treated as belligerents.
How convenient that this book link came across my skype just the other day because the Reconstruction Acts are STILL in place (current voting system proves this for the current voting system was CREATED by such) and the Military (LORD of hosts) is STILL firmly in control because the people keep warring against LORD God.
I know it sucks, but I have to inform everyone of another update to the CR ™ EXAMPLE provided from above. Really, there are only TWO small changes (in bold):
1: In the initial and second CR™ letters, I am of the thought that it would be wise to add the word "outstanding" in the language of the acceptance of the debt by the "Settlor, Grantee, Grantor" to wit:
Undersigned Settlor, Grantor, Grantee accepts the full dollar value of offer outstanding as the current balance due for Current-Month Current-Year. Enclosed please find one dollar postal money order for Current-Month Current-Year payment leaving a Next-Month Current-Year balance of full dollar value of offer minus Money-Order-Amount (ex: one dollar).
outstanding = prominent, unpaid, unresolved; 1. Remaining undischarged; unpaid; uncollected; as an outstanding debt. 2. Existing as an adverse claim or pretension; not united with, or merged in, the title or claim of the party; as an outstanding title. (from Black's Law online)
2: This is more of an update to the wording, but in the final CR™ letter, I am of the thought that it would be wise to update the wording of the first notice within the letter to read:
Pursuant to our agreement, RB XXX XXX XXX US (initial CR™), as AMENDED pursuant to RB XXX XXX XXX US (conditional CR™ ), please kindly resist from adverse operations and/or administration against the FIRST MIDDLE LAST (as addressed) entity and/or any property and/or accounts held under and/or for the FIRST MIDDLE LAST (as addressed) entity other than agreed upon by ALL parties.
This should finalize the language for these EXAMPLES, but as always, make whatever changes you feel is necessary; how does your heart lead you to act?
Question: If there is a levy on social security from department of justice for a restitution charge can the process of acceptance be made without a presentment/bill?
Answer: The offer received is conditionally accepted for value upon proof of claim and returned for value, settlement, and closure.
..."offer received" is footnoted which mean which means an alleged charge/claim on account 123-45-6789
Question: Well, if there is a "restitution charge," then would it be safe to assume that is the result of a court case? For if that is the case, then the "offer" would be the combination of the initial complaint and the final order.
Answer: Now it appears one would contact the US DOJ General Counsel with the CR™ "process" to settle up that lien/levy.
Point being is go to the CAUSE of the problem; there is ALWAYS a reason that something has occurred and there is ALWAYS a record of such.
Comment: I will contact the clerk of court since not only does the clerk deal with the records they also are the ones who receive any amount obtained and distribute accordingly. I was thinking I could just reference the NAME and SS# for settlement to save some time.
Answer: Im not sure how anyone has a claim when Jesus died on the cross was probably the biggest legal transaction in history as He said it is finished, meaning every legal mandate is now met. I guess it is up to us to execute as ambassador in peace. CR™ makes that happen
Comment on process details: I'm constantly updating the EXAMPLE docs so people can see how easy this all really is.
1. Establish initial contract/accord
2. After initial 30 day period, Accept Dishonor and tender 2nd Payment on NEW Contract AND in the meantime, Conditionally Accept ANY Re-attempt at Collection
3. Finalize the contract/accord
If anything goes into Court, then hit them up with the Turnabout.
Now, one should see the entire contract and all one really need to know is "Where is the proof of claim?" for without the Proof of a Claim: a right to compel performance, all there exists is WRONG and the greatest enemies of PEACE is force (to compel) and wrong.
What one has in these docs is a simple contract, the time frame for responses (10 to 30 days) CONFIRMS the agreement(s) and this is what one is operating; the complexity of the agreements/accords/contract created is all dependent upon the one creating the contract and it is the creator of such that must comprehend the agreement in order to execute such properly and this is why I keep it to a simple "proof of claim else anything else is barratry (act against peace)"
Once you see the path that has been presented to me thru the Spirit, you see that very little of what other people call "truth" means a damn thing; hence why I keep saying "I don't really care"; for it is written that where two or more are gathered (Truth) shall be there, and this is what is being accomplished with the CR™.
Because in the end, all that matters is "where is the proof of claim?" for claim = right to compel performance.
Anything less is just plain uncivilized.
Re: CR™ "process" updated EXAMPLE CR™ docs with jurisdictional challenge
CR™ first contact
CR™ second conditional (30 day notice)
CR™ second conditional (re-attempt to collect)
CR™ final
And the first rough draft of EXAMPLE letter for supreme court regarding attorney actions:
Question: Where do I find the new updated "initial CR™ " so I can make the changes ? I can open it, but can't make changes. Hoping I don't have to type this all out.
Answer: CR™ "process"of course you do.
Those letters are suggestions, an example.
I expect you to be able to comprehend the basics so you can begin to write letters of your own. But until then, and in the words of Sean Connery as William Forrester in Finding Forrester (2000):"I helped him find his own words by starting with some of mine.."
How else am I going to be sure you at least READ what has been provided?
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims; Resistance is futile.
Guest: Haha I figured it out. I always read the materials, comprehending the basics is sometimes a challenge. I've been studying this CR ™ the last two weeks since you last talk shoe. I definitely put the effort in but sometimes it just doesn't resonate. That's why I have so many questions. I appreciate your patience. I'm going to make this work.
Admin: What specifically are you having difficulty with or not resonating with? Might help to share that we may learn from what is blocking you.
Question: ...about the Judge and Lawyer not obeying the law and you told me to file a claim with the Texas Supreme Court and another claim at the District Court for Contempt ...while we were talking you said you had a good file that I could use as an example to use when filing with the Supreme Court of Texas ...I looked on the forum, but can't find anything posted. Could you email me a link or show me where the file is? If not too much to ask, could you email it to me at (email) I'd appreciate it a lot ...my trial is set for December 11th, so I'd like to get it to the Supreme Court Monday morning and need to work on it this weekend ...Thank You ...I came away from the call with a renewed sense of joy, knowing that I've got a shot at not going to jail for 2-10 years with your help. Thank you again for the advice that I'd yet thought of.
Answer: Those examples are located here.
Guest: Thank You.
Just so you know, these are the exact same one's I sent on Tuesday and they received them on Thursday ...so my last question is this ...should they be hand written as well or can they be typed?
You have no idea how just talking with you last night gave me a sense of relief, knowing that I had other options, other than being rail-roaded through some belligerent court process, then thrown in jail for 2-10 years for doing absolutely nothing wrong. I believe God is in this and as always, He takes care of things, at the last minute to show us that He's still in charge. I believe God is in the TRUTH coming out and I can't thank you enough and God for revealing this to me. You are a God-Send and I truly believe that...
May God Bless you and Keep you, so once again...Thank You for helping all those who will listen.
ADMIN: Yea, that is the way we roll. ~ Boris
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct.
Question: I noticed that the updated CR™ examples do not show any stamps being affixed to them. Is this because we are to no longer use stamps or is it because the use of stamps is implied?
Also, if stamps are still to be used, above the 3 cent stamps we are to write the ssn in green with no dashes. However, the acceptance language shows the SSN with one dash after the 2nd digit. Is the use of these two ssn formats on purpose or an oversight? If on purpose, what is the meaning of the dashes, whether 0, 1 or 2 dashes are used?
Answer: No, it is because I am lazy and they were done the first time to show ...everything else will merely be the meat, not the structure. [end]
This is an example of the acceptance language that accompanies the updated CR™ examples provided acceptance_language.pdf
Question: Sorry to appear 'dense' & 'dumb,' Boris, but what does the "C.S." signify here - First Middle Last, C.S. (This is your Signature)?
Answer: C.S. is for Corporate Sole : see wikipedia page: Corporation Sole
From wikipedia: While natural persons who serve as sovereign may pass on, the sovereign never dies in law, thus it is the corporate nature of the office of sovereign that ensures that the authority of the state continues uninterrupted as successive persons occupy the office. Subsequently, the sovereign is made a corporation sole to prevent the possibility of disruption or interregnum preserving the stability of the Crown (state), and so at the moment of the demise of the sovereign a successor is immediately and automatically in place.
Having the Crown as a corporation sole means that the legal person of the sovereign is the personification of the state, and subsequently acts as the guarantor of the rule of law and the fount of all executive authority behind the state's institutions. (not sure if they are using the legal version of "person" or just usage in to ordinary vernacular)
Now, put this into the context of Jesus Christ: Having each one of us as a corporation sole (C.S.) means the legal person (NAME,C.S.) of the SOVEREIGN (Christ) is the personification of the state, and subsequently acts as the guarantor of the rule of law and the fount of all executive authority behind the state's actions. For, while natural persons (each one of us co-heir with Christ) who serve as sovereign (each one of us as Ambassador for Christ) may pass on, the sovereign (Christ Jesus) never dies in law, thus it is the corporate nature of the office of sovereign that ensures that the authority of the state continues uninterrupted as successive persons occupy the office.
Thru the corporate sole, many can and will act as one sovereign resulting in the re-unification of His Church (FAITH) with Man's State (WORKS), making a more perfect union as the many-now-one work to fulfill the FIRST covenant: to subdue and conquer the Earth in His name for His glory. [end]
The Simplistic Nature of CR™
It appears that people still do not comprehend the SIMPLISTIC nature of the CR™ process, so here is some of the WORKINGS of it behind the scenes. Remember, this is the PHILOSOPHY behind the CR™ “process” and not to be confused with actual “process” … “process” is handled within the operation of the CR™ as Trust Protector (ie: Foreign Beneficiary to protect the Public Trust), and this post is by no means exhaustive; just overview.
27 CFR 72.11 MEANINGS: Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime.
27 CFR 19.170 and 19.172 Relief from Surety: one signs ACCEPTANCE by way of accommodation, thus becomes DE-FACTO surety and has an equitable right of subrogation that must be removed
Initial Acceptances are PAY TO THE ORDER of FIRST MIDDLE LAST for one must take possession FIRST before one may transfer (maxim of law: right must accrue to one first) and the ensure the transfer is complete with zero encumbrances, one executes the CR™ to show there is no further outstanding debt and that all parties are in compliance with 40 stat 411, and 12 USC 95a (2) then one Accepts for Value the finished CR™ “process,” makes it payable to the US Treasury; to and for the account of the United States, underwriting the issuance of the 12 USC § 343 Bill of Exchange to facilitate the transfer: credits FIRST MIDDLE LAST for the acquittance and discharge from further obligation while at the same time, transferring the DEBT OBLIGATION to the United States (ie: enforcement of the Peace).
Now when there is no proof of claim with warrant going back to the Treasury, then the matter before the court (or being collected) is a “counterfeit security” in that the one bringing the claim is attempting to “fabricate a claim where none existed” (barratry) in an attempt to “falsify a bounty contract” (counterfeiting) and according to the Hamdan Brief: …in United States v. Arjona, 120 U.S. 479 (1887) …reasoning that “if the thing made punishable is one which the United States are required by their international obligations to use due diligence to prevent, it is an offense against the law of nations.” …This Court has also recognized that the Define and Punish Clause “authorizes Congress to derive from the often broadly phrased principles of international law a more precise code ...necessary to bring the United States into compliance with rules governing the international community.” Finzer, 798 F.2d at 1455 ...In a series of tribunal decisions, treaties, and other authoritative pronouncements, the international community has made it plain that directly facilitating acts of terrorism and other war crimes cannot be tolerated.
This “Bounty Counterfeiting” results DIRECTLY into an act of Kidnapping and then conscripts the one so kidnapped into a military operation against one’s host nation for now one is FORCED to utilize PRIVATE Bank Notes which result in a DEBT BURDEN upon the inhabitants of the country so occupied (ie: falsified Bounty contract PAID = False Flag Operation of which stands FORBIDDEN by Papal Decree (ie: their God)); direct opposition to the restoration of public order and safety; against the PRINCIPLES upon which this nation was founded (ie: read Letter from Jefferson to Madison AGAIN), for even though Martial Law may remain in effect until peace can be FULLY restored, rape, pillage, and plunder are FORMALLY prohibited.
NOTE: The absence of the proof of claim along with the Treasury warrant (ie: facts and laws relied upon) renders the debt collection attempt into FORCED COMMERCIAL INTERCOURSE (ie: forced prostitution) or RAPE and the DEMAND for payment is nothing more than "procurement, pandering and solicitation" (ie: pillage and plunder) at that point, transforming the entire debt collection attempt into a Commercial Crime (ie: Conduct Unbecoming).
This is all done in violation of Book 3, Article 15 of the Law of Nations AND is also done in violation of the Nuremberg Principles AND in violation of Articles 44 and 45 of the Hague Convention AND in violation of Treaty of Ghent; along with numerous others Treaty and International Law violations, resulting in a ACT against PEACE; DISHONOR against the Martial Law and the Law of War, rendering the REFUSAL of the CR™ process a WAR CRIME that the United States is now REQUIRED by international obligations to prohibit; the one(s) acting as a such are now War Rebels.
The Notice of Relief from Surety along with the Assignment of the CR™ “process” via the Acceptance and Delivery of such with the Bill of Exchange COMPLETES delivery and TRANSFERS that duty to the United States for enforcement of its OBLIGATIONS as the CR™ “process” renders the Completed CR™ Contract into a DEBT OBLIGATION of the United States under Title 18 USC § 8 for enforcement of the peace, securing one’s person under Constitutional Duty. [end]
Re: The Simplistic Nature of CR™
Question: I have been working on the CR™ process for a foreclosure case that went to summary judgment back in August. I was on step 2 of CR ™ (step 3 goes tomorrow), and went ahead and mailed in the turnabout docs last week, along with the 2 completed steps of the CR™ process as annex B, via registered mail by a notary presentment. Today the writ of possession was served, and I'm a bit baffled that the turnabout did not seem to phase them. Should I get a certified copy of what's been presented to the court as of now and forward to the postal inspector, or should I wait until the third step of the CR™ process is complete? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Answer: With respect to court cases:
In Florida, the supreme court both admits and disciplines attorneys and has EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction over such. Therefore, I am beginning to ponder submitting the Verification of Complaint and such to the supreme court under CR™ and ask where the attorney has authority and legislative jurisdiction and/or if the court is one of competent jurisdiction to even entertain the matter else issue an order to the attorney to cease and desist or something like that.
The jurisdictional issue is in regards to PEACE: How does anyone have jurisdiction to administrate peace?
And since all juridical officers are conservators of the peace: would allowing this attorney to continue without authority and/or legislative jurisdiction constitute a breach of peace?
The attorney is collecting on a "debt obligation," so if the court claims jurisdiction, then exactly what THING is being demanded for payment for "dollar" is just "gallon"; a unit of measurement? Part of the problem people are having is the courts really have no jurisdiction over the attorneys. The other part is that the courts and even the "policy enforcers" may not even have jurisdiction to bring or even hear matters.
This is where one's imagination takes over for the CR™ can be used against any Court order and judgement because everything is just an offer and once challenged jurisdiction must be proven and if it not be proven then there is none; it can't be granted nor taken. It must be as such.
And exactly which court has jurisdiction to impair obligations of a contract without due process in a competent jurisdiction? Who is the attorney to enter a claim using FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES to pay "fees" to challenge a contract underwritten with substance? And who exactly has jurisdiction to limit access to the court by attempting to sell justice?
This the natural path the CR™ takes when you start comprehending the nature of the failure to answer for without proof of claim, where is the breach of peace warranting the actions of this court and is the judge prepared to accept full personal liability in the event he act outside the scope and authority of his jurisdiction?
Jurisdiction Over Attorneys
Guest Comment: am surprised to read that the courts have no jurisdiction over the attorneys. My comprehension is that attorneys are officers of the court. How can they be officers of the court when court has no jurisdiction over them? With that said, attorneys and courts (including judges and other personnel) are all private enterprises licensed to do business, correct? So, who licenses them? Perhaps the licensor is the one to contact to demand discipline of attorneys/court personnel?
Answer: Attorneys do not have licenses to practice law. That term was changed years ago when people, including myself, file motions of sham because attorneys used to provide affidavits in cases that stated they were "licensed in the State of Florida" and when I requested from the County, the Bar, Secretary of State and the Supreme Court of Florida to produce such license they all came back no such license exists.
Accordingly, a sham upon the court ...which caused dismissal with prejudice. Subsequently, they use the term authorized to practice law or similar language. When they go after somebody that appears to be practicing law or giving legal advice they don't prosecute on the basis of "no license to practice law" but rather charged with the "unauthorized practice of law." While it appears to be a name game or play on words attorneys do not have licenses. That said the Supreme Court has oversight and authority over attorneys. As pointed out since the Supreme Court of the State has such authority over them it appears to be a waste of time to go anywhere else but the Supreme Court.
Question: If the Supreme Court of a state has oversight and authority over attorneys, how does it authorize them? What documentary evidence does the attorney need to have to prove that s/he is authorized to practice on that state?
Answer: would this be a question for the state supreme court as, at least in Florida, they are the ones that authorize them to practice law by authority of the Florida Constitution.
...the supreme court is not used to compel the attorney, it is used to reprimand and punish them.
Supreme Court is contacted to force a public official (re: attorney by way of oath) to either show proof of claim as per the CR™ or act in accordance with their public office and correct a mistake because that is the PUBLIC DEBT OBLIGATION for the exercise of the use of the PUBLIC ESTATE because one the surrender occurs via the CR™ , the instrument takes effect according to its purport and tenor, which means the instrument tender to the curt via the Verification of Complaint is for negotiation with the court as conservator of the peace for the peace and the public official is now usufructuary;
The "public official" subrogates the claims and defenses of the State by way of bond of surety and oath of office with the State in order the State be able to "bring claim" to the "conservators of the peace" in the NAME of the STATE (ie: AS IF they we "STATE OF") because "the occupier is regarded as administrator and usufruct over the public estates" and the first duty is the "restoration of public order and safety"
If one is going to act AS IF one is cloaked with the authority of the State; t hen one is BOUND with the burdens of such as administrator and usufructuary by oath of office and bond of surety for public office and if those items are missing, then that "public official" has full personal liability for such.
Guest Comment: ...I looked through the California constitution and found this:
ARTICLE VI JUDICIAL SEC. 9. The State Bar of California is a public corporation. Every person admitted and licensed to practice law in this State is and shall be a member of the State Bar except while holding office as a judge of a court of record.
So, it appears that on California the state bar admits persons to practice law by way of license. So, a California attorney would have to produce his license (and oath? and bond?) as proof of authorization AND it is the state bar that is to be used to discipline a California attorney.
It turns out it is the same at Florida. You may find this link useful regarding state bar of Florida being charged for attorney discipline: https://www.floridabar.org/public/acap/
People at other states may find this link helpful regarding attorney discipline by state: http://hirealawyer.findlaw.com/choosing-the-right-lawyer/researching-attorney-discipline.html
...but when you go to the State Constitution (at least in Florida), you see that is the supreme court that disciplines them.
The Bar is just a "hotel registry book" and these guys all have to "sign in"
...Previously in debt collection court cases, I would state in open court that " The Plaintiff is a fictitious entity and its attorneys are practicing law without a license. That's contempt of court". I would also mention 18 USC 4 Misprision of felony. Worked every time.
Answer: here you go. They can not fight the truth.
Question: I get the whole CR™ process, but I don't fully comprehend a couple of things on the letter. Could you please clarify for me?
1. $1.00 International stamp on the top right corner , does that to bring it into international court?
2. In camera. Civilian due process required. What does this mean and do ?
3. Cancelled butterfly stamps. What does that do?
4. 3 cent stamps on front and back. What does that do? And why SSN# in green?
Still learning.
Answer:: did you actually READ the Turnabout information and the CR™ instructional material cause I thought these questions were answered within those?
Anyhow:
1. The one dollar stamp acts to BOND the instrument for negotiation within the domain of the competent jurisdiction ...ie: within pure equity.
2. In camera = in the judges chambers or in the Treasury
Civilian Due Process means that one is NOT an enemy combatant. The surrender one does is a "civilian," thus a "protected person" under the rules of martial law and the courts and now those same have certain specific DUTIES and OBLIGATIONS they can not deny for the courts are just "peacekeeping operations". Read Field Manual 27-10 and Field Manual 27-5 for more information on this.
3. Butterfly Stamps = pay the postage for the certificate of mailing. Each stamp is ~ 70 cents and the FEE for the Certificate of Mailing is ~ $1.40. You do the math.
4. the canceled 3-cent renders the instrument into a NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT pursuant to "Negotiable Instrument Banking Law" and pays the "Stamp Tax" imposed by the IRS in 1863, or whatever, to offset 26 USC 6201(a).
The SSN itself is used to "account for" the negotiation (ie: identify the recipient (ie: underwriter) of the "proceeds" from the negotiation, such as "acquittance and discharge from further obligation").
As for the SSN in green, I am not really sure why green, but that is what we do. Now, I'm sure there is some valid reason, but I forget and upon a light search, it appears to have Military Connotations associated with High Rank, therefore, since we are coming in as the "rightful civil authority" might just be the reason, but I'll keep my eye out for the specific answer.
We are called to be architects of the future, not its victims;
Resistance is futile.
If you think you can, you are correct.
If you think you can't, you are correct. Boris
[end]
Release of Surety
I was going to put this over on the "Simplistic Nature" thread, but then I realized that this requires its own thread, but I do think it would help if you all read that thread first.
When one does the AFV/RFV, one is actually tendering an ASSET: deferred income tax asset, in exchange for the ONGOING SEQUESTRATION of the Public Monies AND due to the nature of the ONGOING duties of the Usufructuary of which are:
1. To take good care of the things subject to the usufruct.
2. To pay all taxes, and claims which arise while the thing is in his possession, as a ground-rent and
3. To keep the thing in repair at his own expense.
AFV/RFV is a "security" issued against future performance: the return of the public monies, and until then all one has is "income that may accrue" OR "deferred income tax asset" because the SEQUESTERING of the public monies for MILITARY NECESSITY means ALL obligations; ALL income taxes; ANY tax that arises is ALREADY PAID by the people thus now the people can TENDER this "deferred income tax asset" to offset any "obligation" presented to one thru a FICTION as ALL fictions service the interests of the Republic.
(side note: the Declaration created a trust within the Sphere of the Law of Nations and ALL Nations are bound to protect, defend, and serve; thus ALL FICTIONS are BOUND BY LAW to protect, defend, and serve the Declaration Trust, the united States of America, AND all the "Kings unto themselves": the WHOLE of the Republic)
Therefore, when a FICTION, and/or agent thereof, REFUSES the AFV/RFV or discounts the same a "frivolous" and then an attorney brings the claim before the court, that action is actually A FALSE FLAG OPERATION: KNOWINGLY bringing a FALSE CLAIM against and/or PRESENTING one to a GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTOR for payment against a GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT in a COURT in violation of the False Claims Act on March 2, 1863, 12 Stat. 696 BECAUSE the CR™ "process" VALIDATES and CONFIRMS the peace and the one who initiated just went to war while holding the keys to his salvation (ie: REMEDY) in his hand: the AFV/RFV, thru which that one can obtain either A) a tax credit towards income tax OR B) a tax refund: woe unto ye lawyers for ye hold the keys, but never enter. Thus one REJECTS Christ; rejects the spirit of love and forgiveness.
"I forgive you of the debt of having to return the public monies so I can perform as requested and in exchange you will forgive me of the debt you think I owe" ... this is the how the AFV/RFV should be operating and when one rejects such, one actually rejecting Christ and thus engaged in an act of insurrection and rebellion and since one may not profit from one's own wrong, the one who initiated the case (or continues it), then becomes SURETY for their own claim for they REJECTED Christ as Surety (ie" dishonored the AFV/RFV "asset"); rejected PEACE in favor of WAR.
And since a FICTION can do absolutely SQUAT without a living soul operating it, the moment the action hits the Court, the fiction disappears and the Attorney bringing the claim is on the hook, by way of subrogation and LICENSE, because once "life, liberty, and/or property" were placed in Jeopardy, the fiction disappears by OPERATION OF LAW, EXCEPT for its BENEFICIAL PURPOSE: to transfer acquired interests to the Treasury for the Security of the Nation and thus the PERSON, and the Attorney bringing the claim now has FULL personal liability or SURETY, unless that Attorney can prove up the claim that the AFV/RFV Tender was insufficient to settle whatever debt obligation was presented to the GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTOR for that Attorney is acting ONLY as a "Qualified Heir" to account for and administrate the FICTIONS servicing the Republic, and now has two options:
A) tender bond in lieu of personal surety (ie: bring the court a belligerent for a BOUNTY BOND to WARRANT the ACTION) or
B) usufuct.
So, here are the documents we put together to transfer the DE-FACTO surety while are the same time using the DISHONOR of the TENDER to underwrite the Supersedes Bond required by operation of law once the matter hits Court.
First Document: Certificate of Indebtedness
I really like how this document turned out. The CR™ "process" validates and confirms the peace; the action by the other party DISHONORS that agreement and in doing so, violates the False Claims Act on March 2, 1863, 12 Stat. 696 thus the one bringing the FALSE CLAIM is now indebted to the United States "in the amount not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000, as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note; Public Law 104–410), plus 3 times the amount of damages which the Government sustains because of the act" (ie: bearing of false witness against your neighbor thus violating the whole of the law for if the whole of the law is fulfilled if you love thy neighbor, then the whole of the law is violated if one does otherwise).
Thus we can now use this Certificate of Indebtedness to UNDERWRITE the surety of the case; thus making the one who brings the claim surety of the FALSE CLAIM of which there are NO subrogation rights for one may not profit from their own wrong and because the AFV/RFV was done in service to the United States, our PERSON and its CARGO stands "exempt from arrest and seizure" pursuant to 46 USC § 30908 for "no person shall be held liable in any court when relying on this statute (40 stat 411, and 12 USC 95a (2))".
NO Subrogation rights because the act of initiating the FALSE CLAIM is an Act of War against the United States and a VIOLATION of the "License to Practice Law," thus BONDING the one in dishonor to the SERVICE of the FALSE CLAIM as usufructuary of the Treasury and the Certificate of Indebtedness serves as the SECURITY ISSUED by the usufructuary. (ie: incurs the WRATH of LORD of Hosts)
To use this document all you need do is put the Debtor's Name (one per certificate) and a summary of the CR™ "process;" the one that is on there now, is using the CR™ letters I posted on the "CR™ Process" thread.
Then make a copy; stamp up the copy as usual and file into the County (if possible): The ORIGINAL will also be stamped up, but ONLY for use with the Bill of Exchange. Pull out Certified Copy(ies) and this will become part-and-parcel of the CR™ "contract' you create.
EDIT
We have tried multiple counties here to file the Certificate without success. So, if you can not get the Certificate Filed, do not worry, send it off to the ATF as per written. Just make one unsigned copy for the supreme court.
My thinking: As the Release of Surety becomes part-and-parcel of the CR™ "contract" created, when submitted to the supreme ourt of the State then, without any rebuttal by the Named Debtor, the Court is obligated to SIGN and ASSESS the instrument which would then RATIFY the ADOPTION of the CR ™ "contract" by the State for ENFORCEMENT of the instrument of which would also ACKNOWLEDGE delivery of the ANY interest so acquired, which would be another WHY the supreme court is given notice of its PEACEKEEPING role under the United Nations.
Second Document: Surety Notice of Relief from Liability
This RELEASES the DE-FACTO surety acquired from the initial AFV/RFV to the ATF while at the same time informing them a new Supersedes Bond is tendered: the Bill of Exchange plus Certificate(s) of Indebtedness.
Why the ATF?
Well, since the CR™ "process" has CONFIRMED the peace, the one initiating the case in Court is now engaged in Barratry: trade in the sale of church or state appointments, or PROSTITUTION; making the Case itself a SOLICITATION for the "attorney" is just a SOLICITOR; thus we have "SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION" of which is defined under 27 CFR 72.11 as a COMMERCIAL CRIME: Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime, AND 27 CFR is where ATF is granted its jurisdiction and where the IRS obtains its authority;
Hell, you can use the ENTIRE damn definition because when the FALSE CLAIM hits the Court, the one bringing claim is attempting to engage in ROBBERY and LARCENY thru an Act of Involuntary Servitude (ie: US v Kominski) by way of COUNTERFEITING a DEBT OBLIGATION (ie: security of the United States), of which the United States has a DUTY to prevent (see Hamdan Brief), by presenting the same to a GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACTOR (NAME plus SSN_IN_EIN_FORMAT) for payment thru a GOVERNMENTAL CONTRACT (SSN) in an open court, thus attempting to turn the court into a HOUSE OF ILL FAME and the Judge into its KEEPER and done while the NAME VESSEL is engaged in service to the United States making it and its cargo EXEMPT from arrest and seizure.
Thus the DELIVERY of the Notice and the BOE effectively transfers the "ANY interest" acquired from the initial AFV/RFV to the Treasury because that IS the interest acquired: SIN (ie: solicitation of prostitution or enticement to fornicate and drink with the whore of Babylon: an offer to become like Lot's wife)
(side note: a friend has a buddy that went to an IRS Criminal Investigation (CID) meeting. He brought with him a Notary. The CID asked him who that was an he told them: "This is a travelling notary. I brought him with me because there may be some affidavits in need of signature and I also brought a fingerprinting kit and some DNA collection kits because I need to make sure who everyone is because I believe you all are engaging in treason because your authority is under Title 27 and I need to ascertain your constitutional authority or have you sign affidavits stating you have such" ...(Everyone got up and stormed out of the meeting within two minutes.)
Third Document: Bill of Exchange
This is the BOE derived from 12 USC § 342, only difference is that we are not using the "decedent Federal Reserve Bank" (SSN) to underwrite the BOE, we are using the Certificate(s) of Indebtedness to underwrite.
To use this document, just stamp it up like we normally do and then BIND the Certificate(s) of Indebtedness to the BOE and make sure you stamp those up accordingly and endorse on the BACK SIDE ONLY; with the LAST ACCEPTANCE from the Updated Acceptance Language, of the BOE and any Cerifiicates. It would help if you kept an ORIGINAL of the Second CR™ Letter to bind with the BOE, but it is not necessary; but if you did, also stamp, endorse, and bind that Letter to the BOE as well: put it right behind the BOE but in front of the Certificates.
Fourth Document: OF 90
This is just a personal property release from surety form. It acts like an order given to a judge to sign.
STAMP but DO NOT SIGN.
*****************
When you have all the docs completed and ready stamp, endorse, and send ALL ORIGINALS and a copy of the CR™ "contract" to the ATF using the Address provided within the Surety Notice; keep copies for yourself as this completes the CR™ "process" for the Turnabout Annex B. (reminder: stamp and endorse the CR™ "contract" as well AND Stamp but DO NOT endorse nor sign the OF 90) [end]
See Also:
Novation of An Existing Contract
Legal Definition of a Contract